We are you.

Erin Malone points to Communication Arts: “Us Versus Them” by Nancy Nowacek which makes some good points about the ‘D’ word, but gets a little peevish for my tastes when it starts discussing web design e.g. “Many were liberal arts majors who, for lack of a more immediate career, bought a computer and mastered 3-D buttons and drop shadows.”

This is a nice quote from the article:

“Design is both problem seeking and problem solving”

Erin Malone’s post discussing the piece chimed with me. She talks about how a lot of people don’t like describing themselves as graphic designers anymore because of the negative connotation created by the excesses and attitudes asscoaited with it.

“I am an Information Architect. I am a Graphic Designer. I use my skills and experience across multiple mediums and have great concern for choosing the appropriate solutions for the medium. There shouldn’t be an Us vs. Them. We are Us. We are Them. There are a lot of people I know who feel the same way.”

I’m not a ‘trained graphic designer, I’m not ‘trained’ in information/library science. I spent 5/6 years in architectural college studying ‘problem seeking and problem solving’.

My job title is ‘information architect’ mainly because the people I work with feel more comfortable calling me that, but over the last 6 months here, myself and others have spent a lot of energy on advocating processes and approaches from various design disciplines to our colleagues.

Design has moved from being something that happens late in the process – putting “lipstick on gorillas” to something integral to each project, program and person in the business.

I was in a meeting with all of the senior managers of the business yesterday and the most senior person there said “we’ve got to show others [parts of the BBC as a whole] how to get the problem clear, before they start thinking of solutions”. A fantastic moment. It became clear that nearly everyone I work with is getting into a ‘design thinking’ mentality.

We’ve started to suceed in showing the business value of design, design as problem seeking and problem solving.

I feel cool with saying I’m a designer again.

Happy Holidays.

And the winner is…

Stewart Butterfield!! He correctly stated the significance of both Physics Football Team shirt numbers. A No-Prize is winging it’s way from the blackbeltjones-bullpen to Vancouver…

“Feynman and (1/)137 is explained here (it was also discussed in QED and probably mentioned in his other books as well).

I don’t know the 10^88 connection, but I’m pretty sure the standard model give 10^79 for the number of particles (not atoms) in the universe (google … google … OK, I’m wrong: 10^88 it is).”

Honourary mentions to Eric Scheid who got the Sagan connection, and Astroboy for being first, if a little off…!

Team shirts for the Fantasy Physics Squad

I know they are rip-offs of those ‘philosopher football’ shirts that clever
people who wanted to reinvent themselves as David Baddiel wore at
college… but physicists are cooler, and have better numbers*.

I have to figure out how to manufacture them… ready for summer!

Midfield general Carl Sagan and plenty of room at the bottom for Team captain, Richard Feynman

(* a blackbeltjones no-prize for anyone who knows the significance of each player’s team number in each case…)

What do Ted Nelson, Tim Berners-Lee and KPMG have in common?

Well… they all want to create a two-way mutually agreed hyperlinked medium.

Ted Nelson and TBL want to do it by re-engineering how the web works.

KPMG just want to sue anyone who links to them without prior agreement.

Oops.

I just linked to them!

Seems obvious that a global company that prides itself understanding the business opportunities that this exciting new medium should want to forge ahead in this way. Defining the future through threatening litigation… Ingenious!

Oops. I linked to them again.

Thanks to Tom for discovering this Corporate-Doh! plasticbag.org | weblog

here’s a Mefi thread on the subject