Which is a pun headline that will only work for a very few people.
The critical writing that has gathered around my “city as battlesuit” post has gathered something like critical mass – and it’s way more interesting and better written than what I dashed out for io9.
As for the ‘testosterone-fuelled technoptimism‘ aspects of my writing, well – it’s a fair cop. In my defense I was writing with limited time in a busy week for a science-fiction site, rather than for my critical theory phd advisor, so y’know.
Which is not to say that phds in critical theory are bad things either.
So I guess what I’m trying to say is, I’m sorry if using the term ‘battlesuit’ seemed to trivialise war, the military, weaponry etc. all things I have no direct experience of – and hope never to experience.
This was not my intention. I was simply trying to use an attractive metaphor to grab people’s attention on a science fiction site trafficked by people as adolescent as me and get them interested in the critical discourse of clever people, like you.
The most important part of the sentence for me was ‘surviving the future’ – for which I still believe cities are the key.
This is why I stopped blogging, isn’t it.
And this is why Russell ends his posts with “anyway“.
2 thoughts on “Long life / loose-fit / low ennui”
“Battlesuit” trivialises war? Did someone actually say that?