Man that was terrible, I must have my phaser set to pun. Anyway, Chris Heathcote wants to encode psychogeography in RDF, with a lazyweb idea he calls FOAP: Feel Of A Place.
Full-circle then, from SBJ’s “Cities are great at answering search queries” analogies for the evolution of the web that he suggests in “Emergence”.
So are our cities to be rendered obvious through technology – reduced to digital mappings of the nearest McDonalds pushed to our 3g phones? Yes and no I think is my nonanswer.
Most current visions of ubiquitous computing within the urban real are nothing more than: Cities + Technology + Ease-of-Use. FOAP starts to point to a more complex, advanced mix: Cities + Technology + People + History + Ease-Of-Abuse. This sufficiently advanced technology in the city could be magic.
There are times all of us want to get from A to B, and sometimes we want to get from A to Beowulf: to get lost in the sagas of the city.
I spent a day in the City of London last summer at the height of all the warchalking tizz with artist Heath Bunting, and Kate Rich from Mute where we followed the line of the 2000 year old London Wall. Heath dowsing for water with a twig he cut hastily from a hedge at the start of our walk, and me dowsing for wireless with a TiBook and MacStumbler. Here’s an exchange between the three of us:
“HB: Have you thought of doing a tour? Like the history of cyber or internet or electronic London. Just offer people the stories?
KR: In LA you can do tours of architecture that isnt there any more. Norman Klein. [The History of Forgetting: LosAngeles and the Erasure of Memory http://www.heise.de/tp/english/inhalt/buch/3169/1.html & http://ucmedia1.ucxonline.berkeley.edu/sales/artshum02/ahmain1.html#movie38460]
HB: This is Finsbury Circus, the Circle Line goes underneath this. It also runs under a significant portion of the city wall. It was always interesting to me why it did that – like people said, where shall we put the Circle Line? and 2000 years later the wall has affected the route of it. This was a roundabout question to you Matt: have you any recognition that this mapping that youre doing is influenced by more ancient networks or nodes like wells, or meeting places, or routes?
MJ: Not apart from the obvious one: IT is concentrated in the city of London for the same reason as the powerbrokers, that is for very historical reasons. Other than that Ive not really divined a corridor.
HB: Would they be in the same places as the first cellphone base-stations then?
MJ: No. If you think about the network engineers, they are looking for the most coverage for the most profitable groups of customers. The thing about wireless is its bottom up, grassroots up, no-one really plans how it emerges. So you sort of get this ad hoc collection of nodes around where people are activists.
HB: So you think that an archaeological dig of wireless networking will reveal no ancestry?
MJ: I think it would be twice removed if there at all.
HB: I remember ten years ago, one of the first mobile phone networks only operated in the tube.
MJ: Rabbit.
HB: Rabbit, yeah. It was a really good idea: you have a phone in the office, a phone at home, in the tube you dont have anything. Now you cant even make a phone call from the tube. I always think its good to look back in history to find your ancestors. It gives you legitimacy or understanding.”
Building on other recent thoughts and efforts, FOAP’s a great idea, that could encode and encourage the understanding of cities, not just their easy negotiation.
» Anti-Mega: lazyweb idea 2: FOAP – Feel Of A Place